Speedmaster cal 1861
I just wondering about the current cal 1861 if it is overall a better movement with better durability and less prone to quirks that some of the older cal 321 and cal 861 have had. Service is also important and I am not familar with Rolex. Status and image is not at all important. Thanks for any insight.
Answer:
If you are not concerned with status and image why don't you get a Seiko Diver's watch? They have in house movement's, fairly indestructable and are varying degrees of inexpensive.
I have an Orange Monster that I just love. It was my everyday watch for a few years. I took off my Rolex GMT and put on the Seiko.
Of course I took off the Seiko and put on the Speedmaster Pro.
Chad
Answer:
I have both a Speedy Pro with the 1861 caliber and a Rolex Sub with the 3135 caliber. It would be hard for me to choose between them but I have NO doubts about Rolex durability (I've owned a Rolex since 1989) and accuracy. The Speedy still has to prove itself to me but I'd rather have the current model than a vintage one. The Rolex is bulletproof, the Speedy has a certain charm and is good enough for EVA's. Bottom line? You need both!
Answer:
Although I should add that there's a possibility of getting a lemon in ANY item that you buy, whether it be a car or watch.
Answer:
is a Rhodium plated 861, so technically it is the same movement. I do not quite get why you're between a Speedmaster Pro and a Rolex Sub. A Seamaster would seem the more logical option, but who am I.
I would go for the Speedmaster, you'll probably have enough money left to get a decent diver's watch as well.
Jaap Jaap Uithof Perfection lies in small things but perfection is no small thing Henry Royce
Other OMEGA Quiz:
PO off to the shop?Vintage Omega Restoration And Repair Advice Needed?
Instructions to remove Alarm setting crown for Omega Memomatic . . .?
e-onlinetransfers-ltd escrow service?
Choosing an AT with limited info. Common problem?
Sensitivity to overnight positioning.?